header-logo header-logo

A matter of discretion

02 May 2013 / Francesca Kaye , Mary Hodgson
Issue: 7558 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Francesca Kaye & Mary Hodgson offer some hope for solicitors pursued for breach of trust

A number of lenders are seeking to reduce losses sustained after the sale of repossessed properties by pursuing breach of trust claims. This may be because solicitors are perceived to have deep pockets, but with no deduction for contributory negligence, breach of trust claims can also avoid close scrutiny of lending policies and mortgage applications.

There have been several recent decisions of note on the application of s 61 of the Trustee Act 1925, as well as consideration of what constitutes a breach of trust. These are covered briefly below along with the decision in Nationwide Building Society v Davisons Solicitors (a firm) [2012] EWCA Civ 1626, which offers some hope to firms pursued for breach of trust in the event of being involved (however inadvertently) in a fraud.

Completion & breach of trust

The Council of Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook for England and Wales establishes at cl 10, that completing solicitors acting for a lender

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll