header-logo header-logo

17 April 2019
Issue: 7837 / Categories: Legal News , Competition
printer mail-detail

Mastercard action back on track

The £14bn class action case against Mastercard―rejected by a tribunal last year―has been given Court of Appeal permission to proceed.

In a unanimous decision this week, Merricks v Mastercard [2019] EWCA Civ 674, the court ruled that Walter Merricks can bring proceedings against the bank on behalf of 46 million consumers for losses suffered due to illegal card fees. It held an earlier Competition Appeal Tribunal judgment contained errors of law and the tribunal misdirected itself about how it applied the legislative regime.

Merricks, a former Financial Ombudsman, is bringing the first mass consumer claim under the new ‘opt-out’ collective action regime introduced by the Consumer Rights Act 2015. The case now returns to the tribunal.

Boris Bronfentrinker, partner at Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, who is representing Merricks, said: ‘Whilst it had been commented that the claim against Mastercard was overblown, the Court of Appeal has... definitively determined the opposite, recognising the need for mass consumer collective actions to be able to be pursued.’

Issue: 7837 / Categories: Legal News , Competition
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll