header-logo header-logo

Divorcing farmers—married to the farm?

02 July 2021 / Hannah Porter
Issue: 7939 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail
52125
Hannah Porter explains why there can be so many complications for divorcing farming couples
  • Depending on individual circumstances, going through the divorce process can be relatively straightforward or incredibly complex. Usually in the latter camp are farming families, whose assets often require a good deal of untangling, and whose future financial situation is inextricably linked to the consequences of Brexit.

In any divorce, financial claims can include income, capital, property, pensions and claims against the business owned by either party. For farmers, their business is the family farm; financial aspects will encompass farming and management accounts, lending, income and expenditure plus evidence of ownership and even the boundary of the land.

Many farms involve farming families spanning generations, often living at close quarters. This can mean strong family ties, co-farming, tenancies, trusts and inheritance are in the mix. It’s perfectly possible that while a farm provides a home for the couple and their children, they may not actually own it. The ‘home’ might instead be owned by their parents

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Payne Hicks Beach—Craig Parrett

Payne Hicks Beach—Craig Parrett

Insolvency and restructuring practice welcomes new partner

Muckle LLP—Phoebe Gogarty

Muckle LLP—Phoebe Gogarty

North East firm welcomes employment specialist

Browne Jacobson—Colette Withey

Browne Jacobson—Colette Withey

Partner joins commercial and technology practice

NEWS
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold dives into the quirks of civil practice, from the Court of Appeal’s fierce defence of form N510 to fresh reminders about compliance and interest claims, in this week's Civil Way
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) has restated a fundamental truth, writes John Gould, chair of Russell-Cooke, in this week's NLJ: only authorised persons can conduct litigation. The decision sparked alarm, but Gould stresses it merely confirms the Legal Services Act 2007
The government’s decision to make the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) the Single Professional Services Supervisor marks a watershed in the UK’s fight against money laundering, says Rebecca Hughes of Corker Binning in this week's NLJ. The FCA will now oversee 60,000 firms across legal and accountancy sectors—a massive expansion of remit that raises questions over resources and readiness 
The High Court's decision in Parfitt v Jones [2025] EWHC 1552 (Ch) provided a striking reminder of the need to instruct the right expert in retrospective capacity assessments, says Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell in NLJ this week
Paige Coulter of Quinn Emanuel reports on the UK’s first statutory definition of SLAPPs under the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll