header-logo header-logo

03 July 2008
Issue: 7328 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services
printer mail-detail

Manzoor warns Law Society on complaints handling

Legal news

The Law Society is continuing to miss targets on complaints handling and narrowly escaped its second fine in one month last week.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) and the Legal Complaints Service (LCS) failed to meet five out of 13 targets on timeliness, quality and use of resources. They exceeded two and met six targets.

Legal Services Complaints Commissioner Zahida Manzoor, who fined the Law Society £275,000 for its inadequate 2008/09 plan in the first week of June, stresses that her decision to issue a warning rather than a fine this time “is not a cause for celebration”. Further effort is needed, especially on targets measuring “adherence to quality processes”, she says.

She adds, however: “I am pleased that jointly LCS and SRA met their overall target to close 67% of cases within three months (the LCS achieved 63% and the SRA 77%). Since I was appointed in 2004 and began setting targets, the number of older cases has reduced substantially and complaints are being handled more quickly. This is good news for the consumer.”

The SRA and LCS will be considered separately in future after the SRA performed notably better. It hit five of its six quality targets while the LCS achieved only three of its seven quality targets.

Issue: 7328 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll