header-logo header-logo

17 July 2024
Issue: 8080 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , In Court , Profession
printer mail-detail

Mahmood tackles prison crisis

Lawyers have welcomed emergency measures for early release of thousands of prisoners and called for more investment in the criminal justice system as a whole

Speaking at HMP Five Wells last week, the Lord Chancellor, Shabana Mahmood said the male prison estate has been running at over 99% capacity for 18 months. Only 700 spaces remained at the time of her speech, while 300 was officially ‘critical capacity’.

Mahmood said: ‘If we fail to act now, we face the collapse of the criminal justice system… And a total breakdown of law and order… it is now clear that by September, the prisons will overflow.’

From September, prisoners with eligible standard determinate sentences will leave after serving 40%, rather than 50%, in custody. However, this will not apply to prisoners convicted of sex and serious violent offences, or of offences linked to domestic violence including stalking, controlling or coercive behaviour and non-fatal strangulation.

Mahmood also committed to recruiting an extra 1,000 new trainee probation officers by end of March 2025.

Stephanie Needleman, legal director of JUSTICE, said the plans were ‘an important first step.

‘We particularly welcome the much-needed boost to the probation service. However, the government must adopt deeper changes to make sure this never happens again.

‘The best way of keeping people safe and saving money is to build people real routes away from crime by investing in mental health, youth and addiction services and ending the use of short sentences, which do more harm than good.’

Law Society president Nick Emmerson said the Lord Chancellor had ‘acted pragmatically and decisively to tackle a prisons crisis she inherited’.

He said the crisis was ‘just one of many connected problems in the criminal justice system following decades of underfunding’, and called for ‘a more fundamental review of solutions’.

Issue: 8080 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , In Court , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll