header-logo header-logo

01 July 2013
Issue: 7567 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Magdalene compensation “less generous”

Victims of Catholic laundries to receive pay-out

The Irish government has agreed a payout for victims of the Magdalene laundries.

Thousands of women toiled unpaid under harsh conditions in the Catholic-run laundries, which closed in 1996.

Several hundreds of women may potentially be entitled to a package including compensation of between €11,150–€100,000 depending on length of stay in the laundry, full access to the HAA card (the Health (Amendment) Act 1996 card), and recognition that payments will not affect UK benefits.

The compensation is based on recommendations made in a report by Judge John Quirke, president of the Law Reform Commission.

Patrick Allen, senior partner of Hodge, Jones & Allen, which acted pro bono for the victims, says the announcement has “been a long time coming”.

He said the compensation package was, “at first sight, less generous than the compensation packages offered by the Residential Institutions Redress Board scheme, for those who, as children, were abused while in industrial schools, reformatories and other institutions subject to state regulation or inspection.

“However, the Magdalene payments are increased by the award of a pension payment of €230 per week from pension eligibility age. Also, there appear to be no benefits to families of deceased laundry workers and no legal costs payable to assist applicants to obtain their awards, other than advice on the waiver of claims and to set up a personal injury trust.”

Issue: 7567 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll