header-logo header-logo

20 May 2014 / Sue Nash
Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-detail

M & S PROFILE: Sue Nash

sue_nash

The new ACL chair talks to NLJ about the exhilaration of setting up two businesses & her legal inspirations

Sue Nash, founder of Litigation Costs Services & Omnia Software, is the new chair of the Association of Costs Lawyers.

What was your route into the profession?

I had always wanted to be a solicitor and had a place to read law but ended up reading history instead. I then joined the RAF, leaving after a six-year short service commission, before starting to look into other areas of legal practice. After working for 18 months as a "legal exec" I was fortunate to find a mentor in an "old school" costs draftsman (Ted Samways) who taught me all he knew. I set up in business as a freelance costs draftsman in 1987 and have never looked back!

What has been your biggest career challenge so far?

Setting up in practice—as anyone who has gone down this route knows, it is (in turn) exciting and exhilarating but also very scary! Obviously not scary enough though because in 2012 I set up a second (legal software) business.

Which person within the legal profession inspires you most?

I will always be grateful to my ex-business partner Terry Wisdom who was a founding member of the Association of Law Costs Draftsmen (as it then was) and was the person who believed in (and supported) my vision for a specialist group action practice.  

If you weren’t a lawyer, what would you choose as an alternate career?

This is tough! Quite simply I love everything about the law and after 25+ years I am still excited by it, in fact now more than ever given the current costs landscape, but if I had to choose then an event organiser, wedding planner or a politician—any of these would satisfy my inner control-freak!

Who is your favourite fictional lawyer?

No question: Atticus Finch, To Kill a Mockingbird. His deep sense of justice and fairness is what inspired me to enter the law and is exemplified in real life by the many lawyers who undertake legal aid and pro bono work.

What change would you make to the profession?

While the status of costs lawyers has come a long way (it is now a fully regulated profession and costs lawyers enjoy rights of audience), the wider legal profession has been slow to recognise the value and importance of costs specialists. I have no doubt that over time this will change, indeed it has already started, and that we will see costs specialists capitalise on their range of skills to become an integral part of litigation teams but I’d change it today if I could. 

How do you relax?

The honest answer is that I rarely do; with running two businesses and being Chairman of the Association of Costs Lawyers there isn’t much relaxation time left but during rare downtime you will find me reading novels and cooking and entertaining for friends and family.

 

Nominations for the Halsbury Legal Awards 2014, in association with NLJ, are now open. Visit the site to view all the categories and enter online. #Halsbury2014

Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll