header-logo header-logo

18 March 2014 / John Bramhall
Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-detail

M & S PROFILE: John Bramhall

john_bramhall_1

The LSLA president pays tribute to his legal heroes & reveals a passion for sports

DAC Beachcroft partner John Bramhall is the president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association (LSLA). 

What was your route into the profession?
 
I went to school at Reigate Grammar, and after a diet of sport, detentions, and arguing, both in competitions and playgrounds (a perfect training for life as a future litigator) I went on to St Anne's College, Oxford. University was as much about sport, as jurisprudence, so called, but while skippering some London rugby team for Bill Richards (now LG), he persuaded me to do a vacation placement (what on earth...?) at Slaughter and May. After those few weeks, I changed track, and decided to become a solicitor, not a barrister, and spent the next decade in their litigation department, with some excellent people. 
 
What has been your biggest career challenge so far?
 
In career and life… Trying to be patient and to listen properly (I can hear my secretary laughing now!), and retaining a sense of perspective, however challenging a situation may appear. I try to help myself in making at least a nodding attempt to achieve those aims by working with people who first, I like; but second, who I think are cleverer than me (not hard, I can hear you say); but people who will challenge me, and tell me why I am wrong, even as trainees/NQs/baby juniors. More widely, and as incoming LSLA President, I see real challenges for the litigation legal community in coping with the aftermath of the Jackson reforms, and the train crash that was Mitchell. To my mind, the legal profession has done nothing to deserve being treated like naughty schoolchildren, and we should not be looking over our shoulders, thinking there but for the grace of God go I... and fearing a negligence action for missing a deadline that has caused no prejudice. Still. Welcome to the Brave New World. 
 
Which person within the legal profession inspires you most?
 
In university days, Lord Denning, for his style of writing and desire to achieve a fair outcome. But within the workplace, I suppose that in my early years, those around me—I was technically articled to Francis Neate, whose way with people and drafting abilities were special. One of his clients was English cricket's governing body, which was a joy, as dealing with disciplinary hearings for Gatting, Lamb, then ball tampering and South Africa wasn't really work at all!  Deborah Finkler was my "Aunty" on qualification and looked after me in the early years, and I always liked the cartoon picture in her office—"Settle? Where's the fun in that?". In later years, I learned a lot from Clive Zietman about how to develop a practice, and his comment in an article like this one, that litigation was his "hobby" made me smile. 
 
If you weren’t a lawyer, what would you choose as an alternate career?
 
International diplomacy. 
 
Who is your favourite fictional lawyer?
 
Patty Hewes from Damages, but Ally McBeal would be much better company for a night out. 
 
What change would you make to the profession?
 
A compulsory training week for all new judges in a solicitors' office, doing late night bundling and preparing costs budgets. 
 
How do you relax?
 
I have on occasions been accused by those closest to me of being a sports obsessive. Quite unfair of course, and in any event, it is simply my way of relaxing. I have played both rugby and cricket with enthusiasm (albeit limited ability) for many years, and although increasingly a spectator these days, I did manage to play my first game of rugby (age 52) with my Quins Academy 18 year-old-lad v Stade Francais Voltigeurs last month—and he went off injured before me, which is something I will not let him forget in a hurry! 

To feature in Movers & Shakers in NLJ please contact newlaw.journal@lexisnexis.co.uk

Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll