header-logo header-logo

Lords unanimous on right to life

01 January 2009
Issue: 7350+7351 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Human rights , Mental health
printer mail-detail

Health providers are not outside the reach of Art 2 of the European Convention

The House of Lords has held that a health authority can be liable for a breach of Art 2 (the right to life) of the European Convention on Human Rights, and must take reasonable measures to avoid real and immediate risk of harm to patients who have been sectioned.
Savage v South Essex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust [2008] UKHL 74 concerned the death of Carol Savage, who took her own life in 2004 after running away from Runwell Hospital where she had been detained.
The deceased’s daughter,Anna Savage, started proceedings against the trust under the Human Rights Act 1998 on the basis that the trust was a public authority and liable for her mother’s right to life under Art 2, as well as her own right to family life under Art 8.
Previously, the High Court ruled that gross negligence needed to be proved in order for an Art 2 breach to occur. However Anna Savage appealed on the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll