header-logo header-logo

11 December 2025
Categories: Legal News , Family , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Long hours, stress & unsustainable fees at the Family Bar

Family legal aid barristers are so overworked and underpaid that many would leave the sector ‘in a heartbeat’, according to a Bar Council report

The report, 'System overload: a report into family legal aid', published this week, is based on research with 100 family legal aid barristers. It portrays a group of dedicated practitioners routinely working 70-hour weeks yet sometimes struggling to pay their bills as the fees earned are worth approximately half of what they were in 1996.

One barrister who has worked in the area for more then ten years described how she made £7 per hour for a piece of work that took her 15 hours. Another barrister said working ‘more hours for less money’ was ‘the only way we can keep the show on the road, in other words to safeguard the children who are at the heart of everything we do’.

Courts often lack heating, wheelchair access, drinking water or sinks with working taps. According to one barrister, the ’terrible’ condition of the court estate ‘feels quite reflective of how people are feeling’.

Bar Council chair Barbara Mills KC said: ‘The people working within the system are collapsing and this cannot be ignored or tolerated.

‘The very real impact the financial and systemic pressure legal aid work is having on barristers’ health and wellbeing, made plain in this report, is extremely alarming. It is unacceptable that some family barristers are unable to support themselves and are being driven away from the profession at a time when legal aid representation is in desperate need.’

Mills called for an increase in legal aid rates, investment in the court estate and a government commitment to updating the fee schemes through an independent fee review body.

James Roberts KC, chair of the Family Law Bar Association, said the report ‘will make depressing reading for barristers working under the legal aid schemes but perhaps more importantly for their clients who are among the most vulnerable in our society.

‘Barristers in this field are effectively being paid half as much as they were in 1996 for twice the work. This is unsustainable.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll