header-logo header-logo

25 June 2025
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Charities , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

London Legal Walk achieves another record-breaking year

The annual London Legal Walk has once again broken records, highlighting the extraordinary commitment and support from the legal community

This year’s event saw over 19,000 walkers from 1,200 organisations participate including law firms, chambers, advice charities and law schools. Solicitors, barristers, judges, and their families and colleagues joined forces for a day of solidarity and philanthropy in support of access to justice. 

With record-breaking participation at this year's event, an impressive £970,000 has already been raised. With donations still coming in, contributions are expected to surpass £1m for the second year running, demonstrating the community's generosity and unwavering dedication to this vital cause. 

Bob Nightingale MBE, head of engagement & relationships, said: 'Once again the legal profession has turned out in force to support access to justice. The funds raised will make a huge difference to the lives of thousands of people in need.' 

The London Legal Walk is more than a one-day event. It is a lifeline for many free legal advice charities. As the cost-of-living crisis continues, the demand for free specialist legal advice increases by the day. Meanwhile specialist advice agencies face chronic underfunding, rising operational costs, and a shrinking pool of social welfare law experts. Compounding these issues are workforce shortages and difficulties attracting new talent to an underfunded sector. The situation is urgent, and we need your support now more than ever.  

With more than £12.5 million raised since it began in 2005, the Walk has helped over 100 frontline legal advice charities every year.  Thank you to everyone who walked, donated and volunteered their time, highlighting the incredible power of collective action and teamwork. 

There is still time to donate.  

For more information about the London Legal Walk and to see a full gallery of photos from the event, please see here.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll