header-logo header-logo

London: holding its own?

09 May 2019 / Julian Acratopulo
Issue: 7839 / Categories: Opinion , Profession , Brexit , ADR , Litigation trends , Trends
printer mail-detail
London International Disputes Week offers us the opportunity to showcase the UK’s legal hub, says Julian Acratopulo

The cloud of Brexit has hung over the London legal community for almost three years now, with many all too willing to admit that ‘winter is coming’. The analogy to Westeros is self-evidently extreme, but it is clear that London faces very real competition to its position as the pre-eminent global forum for the resolution of international disputes. Much has been written and said about the new commercial courts that have been set up in Amsterdam, Frankfurt, Paris and Brussels. They have a clear objective to drum up support for the resolution of disputes, in a post-Brexit world, which might have previously been dealt with in London. That competition is, however, just the continuation of a trend which has seen the emergence of international courts in Asia and the Middle East. Those challengers are well funded, supported by substantial infrastructure and have for a long time been attracting judicial talent away from

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll