header-logo header-logo

Locked up without trial

07 September 2020
Issue: 7901 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail
Plans to increase custody time limits from 182 to 238 days have prompted alarm among legal professionals

Lord Chancellor Robert Buckland unveiled the proposed two-month extension this week, as part of a package of measures to address the backlog of cases. It will apply to persons accused of offences due to be heard in the Crown court, is expected to come into force on 28 September and will remain in place for nine months.

However, legal rights group Justice hit back with a stern rebuke, pointing out that time limits can already be extended on an individual basis due to illness, absence, the need for separate trials or some other good reason, and that a Coronavirus Crisis Protocol for the Effective Handling of Custody time Limit Cases has been in place since April, with judges and prosecutors deciding each case on an individual basis.

Justice said, in a statement, that it was ‘therefore extremely concerned that this measure will create a blanket extension of detention for all those remanded in custody, irrespective of their circumstances.

‘The right to liberty is protected by Art 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights. This requires the question of whether continued detention is justified or necessary to be decided on the circumstances of each individual case.’

Justice suggested, instead, that fully remote jury trials be used, where all participants join via video, jurors joining together in a socially distanced hub, and with the hearing livestreamed to a virtual public gallery. It said it had tested this option and found it fair.

Justice director Andrea Coomber said extending time limits sent a message ‘government is not prioritising the administration of justice during this crisis’. 

Amanda Pinto QC, Chair of the Bar Council said: ‘We are very concerned that this 25% increase in the lawful detention of a potentially innocent person because there aren’t enough courts available to hear their trial does not become a license to push off cases for longer than absolutely necessary.’

Jury trials resumed in May but have been vastly reduced due to social distancing requirements. So far, ten temporary Nightingale courts have opened. 

Issue: 7901 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

London promotion underscores firm’s investment in white collar and investigations

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Private client team strengthened by partner appointment

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll