header-logo header-logo

LNB NEWS: SRA guidance updates and new warning notice published

The SRA has announced the publication of a range of new guidance covering the financial sanctions regime, immigration work and effective supervision. It has also issued a warning notice on involvement in strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs).

Lexis®Library update: The SRA’s new financial sanctions guidance is aimed at firms to ensure they understand their obligations under the financial sanctions regime and what they need to do to comply. It includes a comparison table setting out differences between the sanctions and AML regimes, guidance on controls firms should put in place, screening tools, what to do if a client is sanctioned, reporting obligations, licensing, and the interaction between reporting obligations and legal professional privilege. It also includes guidance on risk assessments, including a list of risk factors and a list of red flags for attempted circumvention of the sanctions regime.

The SRA’s new immigration guidance follows on from its recent thematic review of immigration and asylum work. It covers communications with clients, preparing properly for online hearings, and making it easier for clients to complain or give feedback. 

Effective supervision was one of the areas covered in the immigration thematic review and it is this that has triggered the SRA to produce separate overarching guidance on effective supervision applicable to all solicitors and firms that supervise individuals delivering legal services, including services that are provided by individuals not regulated by the SRA.

The SRA’s latest warning notice sets out the SRA’s expectations in relation to identifying proposed courses of action that could be characterised as SLAPPs, the sorts of behaviours that concern the SRA and that are likely to result in regulatory action and its expectations around the labelling or marking of correspondence. The warning notice is aimed at all SRA-regulated firms and individuals who conduct litigation or give dispute resolution and pre-action advice.

Sources:

• Sanctions regime guidance helps firms stay compliant

• Review looks at the competence of immigration service providers

• Solicitors warned about involvement in SLAPPs

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 28 November 2022 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: www.lexisnexis.co.uk.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll