header-logo header-logo

26 October 2021
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Cyber , Cybercrime
printer mail-detail

LNB news: SRA announces new affirmative cyber clause for solicitors

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has announced that a new clause will be added to the minimum terms and conditions (MTCs) for law firms’ professional indemnity insurance policies to address affirmative cyber cover

Lexis®Library update: The clause has been drafted with legal professionals and insurers, and it has been submitted to the Legal Services Board for final approval. If agreed, it should be in place for any insurance renewals from early 2022 onwards.

The clause means insurance policies will explicitly state whether cover for cybercrime is available and specify what losses fall within scope for a potential claim. The cover is for client and third-party protection. Losses to the law firm, ie first-party losses (except for certain costs of investigating and defending a claim) are not covered. Firms can choose to purchase a separate cyber policy for other risks.

The SRA has also published a summary of responses to the consultation regarding the addition of the new clause. Some respondents, including law firms, agreed that the SRA should be making changes to the MTCs. Insurers argued that the clause should reduce the level of cyber cover that is currently within the MTCs. While some said that the current MTCs give limited scope to manage cyber exposure and this will impact on insurers’ risk appetites and pricing, others argued that any losses caused by a cyber event should be subject to separate cyber insurance policies. One insurer said that while the clauses provided ‘clarity’ on what is covered, they did not provide ‘comfort’. These comments contrast with the Law Society, who suggested that the level of cover should be extended to cover first-party losses.

The SRA Chief Executive, Paul Philip, said ‘professional indemnity insurance offers key protection for the public. Law firms handle large amounts of client money and sensitive information, and that makes them an attractive target to cybercriminals. The clause on cyber losses provides real clarity for consumers, law firms and insurers about client and third-party protection in the event of cyber-attack, without changing the amount of cover specified by the minimum terms and conditions.’

Sources:

Cybercrime clause makes liability clear

Professional indemnity insurance: affirmative cyber cover

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 25 October 2021 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: https://www.lexisnexis.co.uk/

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll