header-logo header-logo

11 January 2023
Categories: Legal News , Brexit , EU
printer mail-detail

LNB NEWS: Report on progress of the Retained EU Law Bill published

The House of Commons Library has published a report on the progress of the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill 2022-2023, prior to the Commons report stage and third reading of the paper, which is yet to be scheduled. 

Lexis®Library update: So far, the Bill has had its second reading on Tuesday 25 October 2022, been considered in public bill committee for four days and been amended 15 times without a division. The approved amendments include those that offer clarification or resolve drafting issues. There have also been no opposition amendments to the Bill, with the vast majority of those proposed either being defeated on a division, not formally moved or withdrawn.

The notable developments that have taken place since the Bill was created include:

  • Grant Shapps succeeding Jacob Rees-Mogg as the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS)
  • the Scottish Government and Welsh Government have each published legislative consent memorandums recommending that consent be withheld for the Bill by the Scottish Parliament and Senedd Cymru
  • the government’s independent Regulatory Policy Committee has criticised the government’s Impact Assessment on the Bill, describing it as ‘not fit for purpose’
  • the National Archives has identified significant omissions in the government’s Retained EU law dashboard; media reports have suggested some 1,400 instruments could have been omitted from the initial catalogue (published back in July 2022)
  • press reports emerged in the new year to the effect that the House of Lords may seek to push back the sunset provisions, so that they take effect later than the end of 2023

The report is accessible here.

Source: Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill 2022-23: Bill progress

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 10 January 2023 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: www.lexisnexis.co.uk.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll