header-logo header-logo

14 May 2021
Categories: Legal News , Covid-19
printer mail-detail

LNB news: Prime Minister announces inquiry into UK’s response to coronavirus (COVID-19)

Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, has made a statement to the House of Commons on the coronavirus (COVID-19) situation in the UK
Lexis®Library update: In the speech, Johnson confirmed that step 3 of the coronavirus roadmap for easing restrictions will commence on 17 May 2021, calling it ‘the single biggest step of our journey back to normality’, however, cautioned that the ‘threat of this virus remains real and new variants pose a potentially lethal danger’.

In addition, the Prime Minister has announced that a full and independent inquiry will be launched into the UK’s response to the pandemic in Spring 2022. Delaying the inquiry should, according to Johnson, ensure that additional burden is not placed on the NHS, the government and scientific advisors as they continue to the battle with coronavirus.

Acknowledging that many would like the inquiry to commence earlier, Johnson confirmed that reports and parliamentary inquiries will continue to take place as they have done until now to make sure lessons are learnt throughout all stages of the pandemic.

In his statement, Johnson also announced the establishment of the UK Commission on Covid Commemoration to help remember those who have lost their lives to coronavirus, honour frontline workers and celebrate those who have developed the vaccines. Commission membership and terms of reference will be set out in due course.

Source: PM House of Commons Statement on COVID: 12 May 2021

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 13 May 2021 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: https://www.lexisnexis.co.uk/

Categories: Legal News , Covid-19
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll