header-logo header-logo

05 April 2023
Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

LNB NEWS: Law Commission review of financial remedies on divorce and dissolution

The Law Commission has announced a review to assess the options for reforming the law governing finances on divorce or dissolution of a civil partnership. 

Lexis®Library update: The project will analyse the current law, determine whether there are problems and what any options for reform might be. A scoping report is due to be published in September 2024.

The Law Commission will consider orders made in England and Wales in addition to the law in other countries. The analysis of the existing law will focus on areas including:

• the discretionary powers given to judges over the division of financial assets, and whether there is a need for a clear set of principles, enshrined in law, to give more certainty to divorcing couples

• whether there should be wider powers given to the courts to make orders for children over the age of 18

• how maintenance payments for an ex-spouse or civil partner should work

• what consideration the courts should give to the behaviour of separating parties when making financial remedy orders

• orders relating to pensions and whether they are overlooked when dividing the divorcing parties’ assets

• the factors judges must consider when deciding which, if any, financial remedy orders to make 

The Law Commission has published a detailed Terms of Reference document, which confirms that the review will not consider child maintenance governed by the Child Support Act 1991, financial provision for children under Schedule 1 to the Children Act 1989, applications for financial relief after an overseas divorce under Part III of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 or cohabitants’ rights.

Source: Financial remedies on divorce

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 4 April 2023 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: www.lexisnexis.co.uk

Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll