header-logo header-logo

22 September 2022
Categories: Legal News , Data protection , Privacy , EU
printer mail-detail

LNB news: Is the GDPR doing its job?—MLex Special Report

MLex has published a new special report entitled ‘Is the GDPR doing its job?’, which looks at the trends in General Data Protection Regulation, Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) enforcement across the 27 EU Member States, the UK, and three EEA countries since it came into force on 25 May 2018. 

Lexis®Library update: Using publicly available data from national Data Protection Authorities (DPAs), alongside fines not in the public domain uncovered by MLex journalists, the report found that in 2021, GDPR fines amounted to €1.07bn, up from €182m in 2020, with Big Tech being responsible for the most GDPR fine amounts (76% at the end of June 2022). The report also considers the Digital Services Act and the Digital Markets Act, passed in 2022 and due to take effect in early 2024, and the lessons that these can extract from the GDPR.

The report also notes that of the 1,473 fines issued between May 2018 and June 2022, 887 fines were imposed for breaches of Article 5 of the GDPR, with Articles 6 (481 fines) and 32 (256 fines) being the second and third most commonly cited articles in fines.

The majority of fines were issued by the Spanish Data Protection Authority, reaching 474 fines since the coming into force of the GDPR, totalling €56.7m, while no fines were issued in Estonia and Slovenia.

MLex also highlighted that 23 out of the 30 DPAs reviewed stated that they did not have enough budget to carry out their activities.

A special edition of the MLex Podcast has also been published alongside the report, discussing the report’s key themes.

Source: Is the GDPR doing its job?

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 21 September 2022 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: www.lexisnexis.co.uk
Categories: Legal News , Data protection , Privacy , EU
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll