header-logo header-logo

17 January 2023
Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Damages , Technology
printer mail-detail

LNB NEWS: HMCTS releases civil fact sheets on online damages and money claims

HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has published fact sheets on the progress it has made in two civil court projects around the Damages Claims Portal (DCP) and the Online Civil Money Claims (OCMC) service. This is part of HMCTS’s programme to modernise the courts and tribunals system to improve accessibility and efficiency.

Lexis®Library update: Since its launch in May 2021 the DCP has issued more than 63,000 claims. The service allows claimant and defendant solicitors to issue and respond to claims through the portal.

By the end of 2023 the DCP aims to introduce the ability to:

• issue and respond to multi-party claims

• facilitate judges providing standard directions orders

• allow legal representatives to request and receive interim judgments

• allow legal representatives to issue a ‘general’ application, with respondents having the ability to reply and judges the ability to make an order

For more information on the DCP, see Practice Note: Damages claims pilot scheme—CPR PD 51ZB.

Since its launch in March 2018 the OCMC service has issued more than 330,000 claims. The project has sped up the claims process as settlements are now reached in an average of 24 calendar days.

By the end of 2023 the OCMC aims to:

• expand to allow legal representatives to issue and respond to claims up to £25,000 in value

• allow multiple users to issue and respond to claims

• allow the issuing of general applications

• introduce the ability to issue default judgments

For more information on the OCMC, see Practice Note: Online Civil Money Claims pilot scheme—CPR PD 51R.

Guidance on the HMCTS reform programme can be found here.

Source: HMCTS Reform: Civil fact sheets 

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 16 January 2023 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: www.lexisnexis.co.uk.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll