header-logo header-logo

14 September 2021
Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-detail

LNB news: HMCTS on lessons learned from conducting multi-handed cases within social distancing restrictions

HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has published an article detailing how it managed a complex murder trial involving eight defendants, four of which were held in a maximum-security prison, under coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic conditions. The article explains how the use of technology enabled the Preston Crown Court trial to take place
Lexis®Library update: HMCTS has said that the trial, which involved the death of a teenage student who was mistakenly killed in a drive-by shooting in Blackburn in spring 2020, may have required the use of the entire court building for the 10 -week duration of the trial had it been necessary for all the defendants to appear in person.

According to HMCTS, this is due to the legal requirement that maximum security prisoners be supervised by a team of specialist prison officers in addition to COVID-19 social distancing requirements.

HMCTS explained that this problem was circumvented using the Cloud Video Platform (CVP) system to establish a video link to various individuals involved. Prisoners attended court via the remote hearing system from their prisons unless they were giving evidence, in which case they would appear in person. Police officers, journalists and relatives of involved parties were also able to attend remotely, thereby further reducing the number of persons in court.

The judge presiding over the case, Mr Justice Turner, has said: ‘The careful deployment of CVP links to the prisons and the exercise of care in limiting physical court appearances to what was reasonably practicable was a challenging exercise in choreography but one which was achieved as a result of commendable co-ordination involving all stakeholders. I am also entirely satisfied that the vital requirement of access to justice was preserved throughout. I have nothing but praise for all those involved in bringing this ship home to port.’

HMCTS has said that the management of this case greatly reduced the potential backlog which would have been caused by the entirety of Preston Crown Court being dedicated to a single case over a period of 10 weeks.

Source: HMCTS on lessons learned from conducting multi-handed cases within social distancing restrictions

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll