header-logo header-logo

Litigators speak up about Jackson

31 October 2013
Issue: 7582 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

NLJ / LSLA survey of litigators reveals widespread concerns over reform impact

Lawyers have expressed concerns about rising costs, damages-based agreements (DBAs) and access to justice, in the first major poll of civil litigators since the implementation of the Jackson Reforms.

The London Solicitors Litigation Association (LSLA) and NLJ combined to poll the 1,500 individual LSLA members whose practices range from large City litigation teams to smaller, niche firms.

A resounding 93% of those polled said access to justice had not increased—one of the principal aims of the reforms, which were implemented in April. Nearly 60% said the new rules on disclosure and new budgeting measures will drive up costs.

The survey is the first in a planned series by LSLA and NLJ to examine the ongoing impact of the Jackson Reforms, how these influence behaviour among litigation teams and whether, over time, they deliver the improvements Lord Justice Jackson sought. The full results of the first survey can be accessed at www.newlawjournal.co.uk.

Francesca Kaye, president of LSLA and partner at Russell-Cooke LLP, says the survey confirms some “early misgivings”.

“More than six months on from the implementation of LASPO, we’re beginning to see how the reforms are working in practice,” she says.

“The next six months will provide even more interesting intelligence as cases work their way through the system under the new rules and we see the first Court of Appeal decisions. We were concerned in April that some of the rules and regulations had been rushed through and poorly drafted.  

“A clear example is the concern surrounding the lack of clarity in the DBA regulations. Despite the indication that the regulations would be reviewed it is little wonder that litigators have stayed well clear in the meantime.” 

Jan Miller, NLJ editor, says: “This first poll of litigators has provided some fascinating insights into the day-in-day-out impact of Jackson. This ongoing collaboration with LSLA’s wide membership gives us a ringside seat in charting the changing attitudes and trends stemming from the Jackson Reforms.

 

Issue: 7582 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll