header-logo header-logo

Litigation on the rise

23 February 2011
Issue: 7454 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Commercial property disputes in the high court are soaring as the economic downturn bites.

Landlords and tenants rowing over subletting, service charges, dilapidations and other property-related issues were responsible for 40 cases in the high court in 2009, up from 28 in 2008.

Sweet & Maxwell, which obtained the fi gures, said companies were trying to cut their overheads by shedding excess offi ce and retail space and this often put the landlord at a disadvantage, leading to a dispute and then litigation. Subletting is a common source of friction where landlords may fear submarket sublets will have a detrimental eff ect on future rent reviews and on the overall investment value of the property.

Disputes often arise over service charges, which can be particularly high in the retail sector, as tenants will scrutinise their contracts during diffi cult economic times.
 

Issue: 7454 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll