Are the courts the best place to resolve complex inquiries? David Burrows asks if there is a role for independent assessors
Are the courts the best place to resolve complex inquiries? The case of Charlie Gard (Re Gard (A Child) [2017] EWHC 1909 (Fam), [2017] All ER (D) 148 (Jul) (Francis J)—the child who had severe brain damage and could not see or hear or breathe unaided because of a mitochondrial condition—calls for pause for procedural thought. It gives rise to questions of how can cases of complex inquiry best be handled by family courts in a way which parties feel is as fair as possible. Is a judge always the appropriate person to resolve these types of question; or are there others who could help? (Nothing here is intended to take away from Francis J all deep respect for the dignity and care with which he decided the case.)
