header-logo header-logo

07 February 2014
Issue: 7593 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Legal reactions to Reality TV

Advice for debtors faced with bailiffs & a camera crew

Reality TV has thrown up new challenges for debt lawyers as well as a never-ending cast of “wannabes”. Defamation and privacy actions are two possible means of recourse for anyone who finds bailiffs and a camera crew at their front door, according to barrister Stephen Boyd, of Selborne Chambers, writing in this week’s NLJ

“In showing the enforcement officer attending at premises, the innuendo would be that the subject of the execution was a judgment debtor,” he says. 

“This would be actionable, if false.” However, existing caselaw makes this line of attack unlikely to succeed.

Boyd offers advice on what the debtor should do when first confronted, and in the following days. “Consideration should be given to challenging the right of the television company to screen what footage they have on the basis of breach of the subject’s Art 8 rights. 

They should be asked to provide, say, 10 days’ notice of their intention to screen the film so that appropriate steps can be taken to apply for an injunction,” he says.

Issue: 7593 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll