header-logo header-logo

02 March 2022
Issue: 7969 / Categories: Legal News , International justice , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Legal profession supports Ukraine

Lawyers condemn ‘act of war’ and warn of exposure to sanctions

Lawyers have expressed solidarity with Ukraine and called on the government to assist refugees.

In a joint statement, Bar leaders in England and Wales, Northern Ireland and Ireland and the Faculty of Advocates in Scotland, unequivocally condemned the invasion as an ‘act of war’ and ‘a gross violation of international law’.

Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said: ‘The Law Society stands in solidarity with the Ukrainian people, the Ukrainian National Bar Association and the Ukrainian Bar Association.

‘We also stand with the Russian people who oppose their government’s illegal invasion of Ukraine, and lawyers who are defending the rule of law in the region.’

Meanwhile, lawyers have been advised to keep a close eye on client exposure to Russian sanctions, including in supply chains.

Pinsent Masons senior associate Stacy Keen, a specialist in sanctions, said any ramping-up of sanctions is likely to affect a far wider range of businesses than previous sector-based measures, hitting not just UK oil exploration and production companies but other strategic sectors such as the information, communications and digital technologies sectors.

‘Businesses should plan on the basis that the sanctions already announced are just the first wave,’ Keen said.

‘They should urgently be identifying not just Russian and Ukrainian business partners but also non-Russian/Ukrainian counterparties that have a significant exposure to these countries.’

However, reports this week that Foreign Secretary Liz Truss briefed MPs that London law firms are delaying sanctions against Russian oligarchs prompted raised eyebrows in the profession.

Human rights barrister Jessica Simor QC tweeted: ‘Law firms can’t hold it up. Only a court could. Are there any court orders? I doubt it.’

Boyce responded, on behalf of the Law Society: ‘It’s the job of solicitors to represent their clients, whoever they may be, so that the courts act fairly. 

‘This is how the public can be confident they live in a country that respects the rule of law―unlike Putin’s tyrannical regime. Solicitors are highly regulated and are not allowed to bring spurious objections to processes―if they challenge the government’s actions, it’s because they think the government is at risk of breaking its own rules.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll