header-logo header-logo

21 June 2007
Issue: 7278 / Categories: Legal News , Property
printer mail-detail

Legal loophole makes HIPs redundant, says RICS

Home information packs (HIPs) are fundamentally redundant because new regulations do not require sellers to produce a HIP at the exchange of contracts, says the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS).

RICS says the loophole in the HIP regulations published by the Department for Communities and Local Government means sellers need only prove they have ordered a HIP at the point of sale, not that they’ve actually acquired one. If a buyer is found and the property taken off the market before the HIP is produced, RICS says, the seller may never need to pay for it.

RICS spokesman Jeremy Leaf says: “Unless the government can show us the regulation that says a property cannot be sold without a HIP, consumers and industry will be left to draw their own conclusions.”
However, Rob Hailstone, chief executive of HIP provider Hipag Services, says a property can only be marketed without a HIP in place if requests for all legally “required” documents have been delivered before the property is put on the market.

Issue: 7278 / Categories: Legal News , Property
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll