header-logo header-logo

Legal aid safety net is “lawful”

26 May 2016
Issue: 7700 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The exceptional case funding scheme, which helps those who fail to secure legal aid for civil matters, is lawful, the Court of Appeal has ruled.

Lord Justice Laws overturned an earlier ruling by Mr Justice Collins that the scheme was complex, rigid and unlawful as it gave rise “to an unacceptable risk that an individual will not be able to obtain legal aid where failure to provide it would be a breach of that individual’s rights”.

The scheme was intended to be a safety net for claimants who fell through the gaps after the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) came into force. However, there has been a low take-up so far. The Ministry of Justice expected about 6,000 applications to be made each year but last year only 1,172 applications were made and 226 granted.

In The Director of Legal Aid Casework v IS [2016] EWCA Civ 464, Laws LJ acknowledged there had been “troubling” difficulties with the scheme but said: “The learning curve will continue.”

He added: “No doubt the Legal Aid Agency and the Lord Chancellor will be astute to look for improvements, and will do so on a continuing basis.”

Dissenting, Lord Justice Briggs said: “In my judgment the defects in the procedures for applying for [the scheme] in the system in place at the time of the hearing before Collins J were systematic and inherent, to the extent that rendered the scheme inherently unfair, so that I would have been disposed to dismiss this appeal.”

 
Issue: 7700 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll