header-logo header-logo

Legal aid evidence victory

10 January 2018
Issue: 7776 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Five-year time limit abandoned for domestic violence victims

A major evidential obstacle to legal aid for domestic abuse victims has been dropped by the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) following a campaign by lawyers and support organisations.

As of this week, there will be no time limit on abuse evidence in private family law disputes-previously, victims had to prove they had suffered, or been at risk of suffering, domestic abuse or child abuse in the previous five years. Opponents said the restrictions prevented about 50% of domestic abuse victims receiving legal aid.

The range of documents accepted as evidence of abuse has also been widened, and will now include statements from domestic violence support organisations and housing support officers.

The Court of Appeal held the evidence requirements set out in LASPO (Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act (LASPO) 2012), unlawful in February 2016, in R (on the application of) Rights of Women v Lord Chancellor [2016] EWCA Civ 91. The MoJ made the reforms after consulting with charities and legal bodies, including the charity Rights of Women, which brought the legal challenge.

Carol Storer, director of Legal Aid Practitioners Group, said less than half of victims fleeing domestic abuse have been able to access legal aid due to the evidence requirements.

‘The evidence was time limited, failing to recognise that the impact and risk associated with abuse can be lifelong,’ she said.

‘The ability to obtain the necessary evidence is difficult and random and often has a cost involved. Obtaining it is usually inconsistent with the lifestyle of the vast majority of victims fleeing domestic abuse.’ Moreover, obtaining evidence of emotional, psychological, financial abuse or coercive control rather than physical abuse was often difficult.

‘It has taken a long time to bring about these changes, and there are still many hurdles in place.’

Law Society vice president Christina Blacklaws said the reform ‘will make it easier for victims to qualify for legal aid and access essential help and support’.

Former justice minister Dominic Raab said: ‘We have listened to victims’ groups and carefully reviewed the criteria for legal aid for victims of domestic abuse in family cases.’

 

Issue: 7776 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll