header-logo header-logo

31 March 2021
Issue: 7927 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

Legal aid drop ‘concerning’

Applications for legal aid in civil cases where there was evidence of domestic violence or child abuse fell by 12% in the final quarter of 2020, according to government statistics
Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce described the decrease, in the Ministry of Justice legal aid statistics quarterly figures, as ‘concerning’.

‘At a time when we know there has been considerable escalation in domestic abuse cases, this reduction raises questions regarding the barrier to legal aid that the “domestic violence gateway” requirements represent and we continue to call on government to allow solicitors to certify that a person is a victim of abuse for the purposes of obtaining legal aid,’ she said.

The statistics, published last week, also recorded a 7% drop in applications for exceptional case funding and a 33% fall in housing work, compared to the same quarter in the previous year.

Boyce said: ‘For the Housing Possession Court Duty Scheme (HPCDS), there were only 461 cases compared to 7,740 in the same quarter for the previous year.

‘This reflects the government policy of suspending possession claims, which we support, but which demonstrates the considerable financial pressure that is being placed on the legal aid housing provider base due to the reduction in cashflow. We continue to call on government to provide additional financial support to ensure the provider base does not collapse.

‘We are also concerned by the continued decrease in exceptional case funding applications―this suggests the pandemic has increased the challenge in making these applications.’

Meanwhile, lawyers and interested parties are invited to respond to the Independent Review of Criminal Legal Aid’s call for evidence before 7 May.

Sir Christopher Bellamy, Chair of the Review, wants to hear how the system as a whole can be improved and placed on a sustainable footing for the future. Submit responses to the review online at bit.ly/3fqtwNK or by email to iclar@justice.gov.uk.

 

Issue: 7927 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll