header-logo header-logo

Legal aid—a bleak future?

26 July 2007 / Richard Miller
Issue: 7283 / Categories: Features , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Is it too late to prevent a race towards low prices for minimum quality? asks Richard Miller

In these turbulent times when we don’t even know what payment structures legal aid firms will be working under in three months, it is an unenviable task to try to forecast where we will be in three to five years.

Of one thing I am certain. The system we end up with will not look anything like Lord Carter’s blueprint (see Legal Aid—A Market-based Approach to Reform). Some of it misunderstood the legal services market and would not work in practice. The Legal Services Commission (LSC) cannot or will not adopt some of the ideas. The government has repeated that there is no more money, which compromises the principle of competitive tendering.
The government is still putting £2bn per year into legal aid. Much of the work is subject to human rights obligations. The government must ensure access to services in criminal defence, public law, family, mental health and immigration, which account for around three-quarters of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Chronic delays, duplication of work, cancelled hearings and inefficiencies in the family law courts are letting children and victims of domestic abuse down, a Public Accounts Committee (PAC) inquiry has found
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
back-to-top-scroll