header-logo header-logo

26 January 2012
Issue: 7498 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Lawyers pessimistic about the future

Despite bonuses lawyers feel their glass is half empty

City lawyers have expressed pessimism about the future—despite receiving bumper bonuses and a salary rise.

On average this year, City lawyers received bonuses of about £35,500 or nearly a third of the average salary, up from a quarter of the average salary last year.

Base salaries rose four per cent to £111,000. This compares with a two per cent salary rise among accountants. The vast majority (86.5%) of lawyers feel their job is secure.

Despite the extra cash in their pockets, however, more than half say they are pessimistic about their earning prospects in 2012, according to a survey by legal recruiter Laurence Simons.

Lucinda Moule, managing director of Laurence Simons, says: “Even though lawyers are naturally cautious creatures, the extent of their pessimism in 2011 is hard to understand when you look at their pay. 2011 also saw bonuses grow.

“Of course, there are some reasons for lawyers to feel concerned about the economic future. The memory of 2009’s pay and hiring freezes seems to have stuck in the minds of legal professionals, even if at the moment they are enjoying the financial consequences of their growing prominence in their clients’ and employers’ operations.”

The survey, of 1,200 corporate lawyers, also showed men would require a higher salary jump in order to move jobs than women, and also had greater experience, on average, in their roles.

Legal salaries abroad have performed as strongly as in the UK, say Laurence Simons. In Brazil, for example, the average lawyers’ salary is £175,000, 57% higher than the UK average.

Issue: 7498 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll