header-logo header-logo

09 November 2023
Issue: 8048 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Pro Bono
printer mail-detail

Lawyers celebrate pro bono work

Two pro bono charities have launched the UK’s first pro bono litigation support service, Pro Bono Expert Support (PBES), as the profession marked Pro Bono Week (6-10 November)

PBES, which is the brainchild of the National Pro Bono Centre and Pro Bono Connect, will bring lawyers, barristers, experts and litigation support advisors together. It will include experts from various disciplines including forensic accountants, eDiscovery providers, strategic communications, investigators, costs lawyers, translation and interpretation providers and a wide range of expert witnesses.

The launch took place at the Supreme Court. Jamie Goldsmith KC, who founded Pro Bono Connect, said PBES ‘brings together crucial services to support pro bono clients through litigation’.

Currently, 22 registered litigation support firms have signed up to join the scheme. Membership is free to join and carries no obligation to take on cases.

Members of the judiciary backing the scheme include Lady Rose, Justice of the UK Supreme Court, and Mr Justice Robin Knowles.

Lady Rose said: ‘The Pro Bono Expert Support service offers those who require legal help the kind of support that will give them the best chance of progressing their case in the most effective way. I am delighted to be supporting this important new initiative that brings together a number of leading practitioners from legal and related disciplines.’

PBES builds on the expertise of Pro Bono Connect, which helps barristers and solicitors collaborate on pro bono cases.

Also this week, the National Pro Bono Centre (NPBC) launched an initiative for retired lawyers to take on pro bono work. It draws inspiration from the return to work of retired medical professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic.

A hub of information on opportunities available for retired lawyers is now available on the NPBC website, with specific information on www.weareadvocate.org.uk for barristers and on www.lawworks.org.uk for solicitors.

Issue: 8048 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Pro Bono
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll