header-logo header-logo

23 October 2019
Issue: 7861 / Categories: Legal News , Technology , Legal services
printer mail-detail

Law tech on the march

The UK is a global leader in law tech, but needs continual investment to stay on top, Law Society research has shown.

Globally, the law tech market is valued at $15.9bn and growing, while global investments in law tech currently stand at $926m. By comparison, investment in UK law tech has increased threefold to £61m in the past year, according to information published by Thomson Reuters, and Law Society research launched at the Legal Geek Conference 2019 in London last week indicates this trend is likely to continue.

The Law Society research found that, while the UK law tech market is at an embryonic stage, venture capital firms and angel investors are backing fledgling companies. Law tech is at a less mature stage than other digital disruption markets, such as fintech, so there is ample scope for expansion. Growth areas of law tech include: legal analytics; legal project management; governance and compliance; and contract management. More established areas include: collaboration tools; document management; IP management; and e-billing. However, the most established areas in the UK are target eDiscovery and legal research.

London is attracting tech investors, the research found, with the closest competitors being Singapore, Hong Kong and the Netherlands. However, the UK leads in some aspects and lags behind in others, and the gap between the UK and competitor nations is not large.

Law Society president Simon Davis said: ‘London is becoming a hub for legal technology, with the capital topping the European investment charts for funding into fast growing sectors such as artificial intelligence, cybersecurity and fintech. Further investment and strategic support will be needed if we are to maintain our competitive edge in the global market.’

Issue: 7861 / Categories: Legal News , Technology , Legal services
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll