header-logo header-logo

03 June 2010
Issue: 7420 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Company—Administrator—Costs of administration

Re Johnson Machine and Tool Ltd and others Re Empire Surfacing Ltd [2010] EWHC 582 (Ch), [2010] All ER (D) 271 (May)

Chancery Division, Judge Purle QC sitting as a judge of the High Court, 27 May 2010

In considering whether to treat pre-appointment administration costs as an administration expense in respect of pre-pack administrations, the court has to compare whether the advantage to the purchasing directors in retaining a business shorn of debt was clearly outweighed by the advantage derived by creditors from the pre-pack administration.

Stephen Eyre and Angus Burden (instructed by The Wilkes Partnership) for the applicants.

Two cases before the court raised the issue of whether it was appropriate to order that the pre–appointment costs of an insolvency practitioner in the case of a “pre–pack” administration be treated as an administration expense. In each case a company controlled by or connected with the existing directors and owners was to purchase the existing business and assets from the administrator immediately following his appointment.

Judge Purle QC:

The legitimacy of pre–packs and the jurisdiction

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll