header-logo header-logo

Immigration—Leave to enter—Family member of former refugee

21 May 2010
Issue: 7418 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

ZN (Afghanistan) (FC) and others v Entry Clearance Officer (Karachi) and one other action [2010] UKSC 21, [2010] All ER (D) 88 (May)

Supreme Court, Lord Phillips P, Lord Rodger, Lord Collins, Lord Kerr and Lord Clarke, 12 May 2010

Paras 352A and 352D of the Immigration Rules (HC 395) do not require a sponsor to be a “current” refugee when an entry clearance application is made by his or her spouse or civil partner or any of his or her children who was under the age of 18 at the time of their application.

Manjit Gill QC, Edward Nicholson and Sophie Weller (instructed by Fisher Meredith LLP) for the appellants. Lisa Giovannetti and Samantha Broadfoot (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the respondent.

The appellants were Afghan nationals. The first, ZN, married her husband (the sponsor) in 1979. ZN and the sponsor were the parents of the other appellants. The sponsor fled Afghanistan and arrived in the UK in August 1999. At some point in 1999 the family went to Pakistan.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll