header-logo header-logo

25 February 2010
Issue: 7406 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Solicitor—Costs—Contentious business

Bilkus v Stockler Brunton (a firm)[2010] EWCA Civ 101, [2010] All ER (D) 182 (Feb)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Ward, Longmore and Stanley Burnton LJJ, 16 February 2010

The Court of Appeal has given guidance on the meaning of contentious and non-contentious work for the purposes of, inter alia, the Solicitors (Non-Contentious Business) Remuneration Order 1994, SI 1994/2616 (SRO 1994).

William Stockler of Stockler Brunton for the solicitors. Tim Chelmick (instructed by HC Solicitors LLP) for the claimant.

In January 2001 the solicitors were retained by the claimant to act for him in a dispute about his interest in a company. A letter of retainer was issued which set out the basis for the firm’s charges.

Proceedings were subsequently issued by the solicitors on the claimant’s behalf. In October 2003 a judgment was issued providing, inter alia, the price for the claimant’s shares was to be determined by an independent valuer, not by the court. The valuer would act as an expert, not an arbitrator.

The solicitors continued to act in regard to the valuation

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll