header-logo header-logo

18 February 2010
Issue: 7405 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Costs—Assessment—Standard basis

Drew v Whitbread [2010] EWCA Civ 53, [2010] All ER (D) 104 (Feb)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Waller, Hooper, Etherton LJJ and Senior Costs Judge Hurst sitting as an assessor, 9 February 2010.

Where the trial judge has in a multi-track case ordered costs to be paid on the standard basis, a costs judge may nevertheless rule that the case was in reality a fast track case and assess trial costs on a fast track basis, even if the point was not raised before the trial judge. 

Mark Friston and Craig Ralph (instructed by Messrs Harris Fowler) for the claimant. Andrew Hogarth QC and Benjamin Williams (instructed by Wansboroughs Solicitors) for the defendant.

At the conclusion of the claimant’s personal injury trial, the district judge found the defendants liable for 75% of the claimant’s injuries. On damages he awarded a total of 9,291.56, which was higher than the sum paid into court by the defendants. Costs were ordered to be assessed on the standard basis. The district judge ruled at the commencement of the assessment that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll