header-logo header-logo

Arbitration—Award—Date of delivery of award

14 January 2010
Issue: 7400 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Papas Olio JSC v Grains & Fourrages SA and another [2009] EWCA Civ 1401, [2009] All ER (D) 193 (Dec)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Mummery, Richards and Toulson LJJ, 18 December 2009

The Court of Appeal considered the rules concerning address for service in the Federation of Oils Seeds and Fats Association Ltd (FOSFA) Rules of Arbitration and Appeal, in particular the FOSFA 4A form.
Steven Thompson (instructed by Michael Robinson) for the claimant. John Russell (instructed by Hill Dickinson LLP) for the first defendant. The second defendant did not appear and was not represented.

The proceedings concerned the existence of a contract for the purchase of Bulgarian sunflower seeds by the first respondent, G&F, from the appellant, Papas. In November 2006, it was orally agreed that G&F would purchase a consignment for delivery in November and December 2006. On the basis of that agreement, G&F’s broker issued a contract confirmation, on amended FOSFA 4A terms. It provided for London arbitration in accordance with the FOSFA rules.

A subsequent arbitration took place, in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll