header-logo header-logo

17 May 2007
Issue: 7273 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

COSTS—ORDER FOR COSTS—DISCRETION

Lamont v Burton [2007] EWCA Civ 429, [2007] All ER (D) 131 (May)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division
May, Dyson and Smith LJJ
9 May 2007

CPR Pt 44 cannot be invoked to circumvent, either directly or indirectly, the mandatory provisions of CPR Pt 45; the only circumstances in which the court may allow a success fee different from that prescribed by CPR 45.16 in relation to solicitors’ fees are those described in CPR 45.18.

Jeremy Morgan QC and William Poole (instructed by Cogent Solicitors, Birmingham) for the claimant. Greg Cox, solicitor advocate, of Colemans-ctts for the defendant.

The claimant was injured in a road traffic accident in September 2004. He instructed solicitors under a conditional fee agreement (CFA) and took out after the event insurance. The defendant admitted liability. Proceedings were issued in June 2005. No defence was filed. A payment was made under CPR Pt 36 in the sum of £1,800 in August 2005, but it was not accepted. A “disposal hearing” within the meaning of CPR 36 PD para 12.4 was conducted in September 2005 at which the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll