header-logo header-logo

Divorce­—Ancillary relief­—Pre-nuptial agreement

10 July 2009
Issue: 7377 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Radmacher, formerly Granatino v Granatino Sub nom NG v KR (prenuptial contract [2009] EWCA Civ 649, [2009] All ER (D) 31 (Jul)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Thorpe, Rix and Wilson LJJ,
2 Jul 2009

The law remains that pre-nuptial agreements are at one and the same time both unenforceable and invalid as being against public policy and matters which the court is prepared to take into account (and possibly decisively) for the purposes of its jurisdiction under s 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 1973).

Richard Todd QC and Geoffrey Kingscote (instructed by Ayesha Vardag) for the wife. Nicholas Mostyn QC and Deepak Nagpal (instructed by Payne Hicks Beach) for the husband.

The wife, who was born in Germany to a wealthy family, came to London in the 1990s. The husband, who was of French nationality, was educated in France but was resident in England. The parties became engaged in June 1998. At the suggestion of the wife’s family, they agreed to enter into a pre-nuptial contract. The parties married in November 1998 and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll