header-logo header-logo

30 January 2026
Issue: 8147 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 30 January 2026

Costs

Federal Republic of Nigeria v VR Global Partners LP and others [2026] EWCA Civ 25

The Court of Appeal dismissed Nigeria’s appeal against a Commercial Court judge’s decision to stay Nigeria’s application for a third-party costs order (TPCO) until after completion of detailed assessment proceedings. The case arose after Nigeria had succeeded in having arbitration awards worth US$11bn set aside for serious irregularity, with P&ID ordered to pay Nigeria’s costs. Nigeria sought a TPCO against the VR Capital group companies and its founder who had funded P&ID’s litigation, as P&ID itself had no assets to pay costs. The Court of Appeal held that the judge had provided sufficient reasons for his case management decision and had correctly applied the overriding objective in deciding that the detailed assessment should precede determination of third-party liability. The judge was entitled to conclude that there was a real question whether any further sums would be payable beyond the £20m already paid, making it potentially wasteful to proceed with the TPCO application before knowing the outcome

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll