header-logo header-logo

28 March 2025
Issue: 8110 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 28 March 2025

Costs

Captivatiun Ltd v Orr Litchfield Solicitors Ltd [2025] Lexis Citation 615

This was a costs judgment before the Senior Courts Costs Office in Part 8 proceedings where the court dismissed the claimant’s application for a detailed assessment of the defendant solicitor’s fees under the Solicitors Act 1974. The key finding was that the claimant failed to establish ‘special circumstances’ that would justify allowing the assessment due to being significantly out of time, and that the claimant’s use of Part 8 in this particular case was an abuse of process.


Wagner v Bright Station Ventures Management Ltd [2025] EWHC 669 (KB)

This was a consequential hearing before the King’s Bench Division, following a substantive judgment in a case between Mr Wagner (the claimant) and Bright Station Ventures Management Ltd (BSVM) (the defendant). The case involved the calculation of the net sum due between the parties and the appropriate order on costs after Mr Wagner’s claims against BSVM succeeded in part and BSVM’s counterclaim largely failed. The court

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll