header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 28 March 2025

28 March 2025
Issue: 8110 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Costs

Captivatiun Ltd v Orr Litchfield Solicitors Ltd [2025] Lexis Citation 615

This was a costs judgment before the Senior Courts Costs Office in Part 8 proceedings where the court dismissed the claimant’s application for a detailed assessment of the defendant solicitor’s fees under the Solicitors Act 1974. The key finding was that the claimant failed to establish ‘special circumstances’ that would justify allowing the assessment due to being significantly out of time, and that the claimant’s use of Part 8 in this particular case was an abuse of process.


Wagner v Bright Station Ventures Management Ltd [2025] EWHC 669 (KB)

This was a consequential hearing before the King’s Bench Division, following a substantive judgment in a case between Mr Wagner (the claimant) and Bright Station Ventures Management Ltd (BSVM) (the defendant). The case involved the calculation of the net sum due between the parties and the appropriate order on costs after Mr Wagner’s claims against BSVM succeeded in part and BSVM’s counterclaim largely failed. The court

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll