header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 26 July 2024

26 July 2024
Issue: 8081 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Competition

Walter Hugh Merricks CBE v Mastercard Inc and other companies [2024] EWCA Civ 759, [2024] All ER (D) 57 (Jul)

The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, dismissing the appeal, held that the Competition Appeal Tribunal, in follow-on claims for damages alleged to have arisen by infringement by Mastercard of Art 101 of the Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union, had been correct in determining issues of limitation, because, given the issue of restriction of competition had been decided by the European Commission and the instant proceedings were a follow-on claim by the class for aggregate damages, the issue of causation and quantum of loss were the most significant issues in the proceedings as they were constituted, and those issues were clearly most closely connected with the respective UK jurisdiction and it was substantially more appropriate for those issues in the proceedings to be determined by the law of England and Wales or Scotland respectively rather than by the law of the other EEA countries where the restriction on competition occurred.


European

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll