header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 22 November 2024

22 November 2024
Issue: 8095 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Criminal law

R (on the application of Michael John Harvey) v Luton and South Bedfordshire Magistrates Court [2024] EWHC 2832 (Admin)

The Magistrates’ Court has a duty under Rule 3(7) of the Magistrates’ Courts (Freezing and Forfeiture of Money in Bank and Building Society Accounts) Rules 2017 to serve a copy of any order made on an application under section 303Z1 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 on the person whose account is the subject of the application and the relevant financial institution. The requirement for public pronouncement of judgments under Art 6 ECHR is satisfied by formally notifying the person affected of the outcome, even if no substantive order is made. The Magistrates’ Court’s refusal to produce an order recording the outcome of the IP’s application on 20 January 2023 was irrational and disproportionate.


Family proceedings

Mrs W v Mr W and others [2024] EWHC 2849 (Fam)

The court made a Parental Order in respect of the child F, transferring legal parenthood from the surrogate (first respondent) to the applicants

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll