header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 21 January 2022

21 January 2022
Issue: 7963 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Conflict of laws

‘Maduro Board’ of the Central Bank of Venezuela v ‘Guaidó Board’ of the ­Central Bank of Venezuela [2021] UKSC 57, [2021] All ER (D) 72 (Dec)

The Supreme Court allowed the appellant’s appeal in part and dismissed the counter-appeal in proceedings concerning the effect of the disputed presidency of Venezuela. The respondent board favoured the previous president (M), while the appellant board favoured the interim president (G). Both sides claimed to act on behalf of the Central Bank of Venezuela, with regard to gold reserves held in the UK. The court held that declarations would be made that the UK Government (HMG) had, since 4 February 2019, recognised G as the constitutional interim President of Venezuela until credible presidential elections could be held. HMG had, since 4 February 2019, not recognised M as President of Venezuela for any purpose. Further, the proceedings would be remitted to the Commercial Court for it to consider whether the judgments of the Venezuelan Supreme Tribunal of Justice should be recognised or given effect

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll