header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 16 February 2024

16 February 2024
Issue: 8059 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Human rights

R (on the application of Castellucci) v Gender Recognition Panel and other cases [2024] EWHC 54 (Admin), [2024] All ER (D) 13 (Feb)

The Administrative Court dismissed the consolidated claims by the claimant for: (i) permission to appeal in the Family Division under s 8 of the Gender Recognition Act 2004 against the defendant panel’s refusal to grant a gender recognition certificate (GRC) to specify their acquired gender as non-binary; and (ii) an application for judicial review against the panel’s decision. The claimant, a citizen of California, had moved to the UK on a Tier 1 ‘Global Talent’ visa. The claimant had been diagnosed with gender dysphoria and was legally recognised as non-binary by the State of California. Their certificate of live birth was also amended to change their sex from male to ‘non-binary’. The claimant’s challenge against the panel’s decision was grounded on: (i) whether ‘on an ordinary construction’ of the Act, it permitted ‘the recognition of a foreign-acquired gender that could not otherwise be obtained under English law’

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll