header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 15 July 2022

15 July 2022
Issue: 7987 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Company

Re ALL Scheme Ltd [2022] EWHC 549 (Ch), [2022] All ER (D) 121 (Mar)

The Chancery Division allowed an application, brought by a newly established company which had executed a deed poll to assume joint liability to creditors of a group of companies (Amigo), for permission to convene simultaneous scheme meetings to consider two alternative schemes of arrangement under Part 26 of the Companies Act 2006, namely the New Business Scheme (NBS) and the Wind-Down Scheme (WDS), in circumstances where Amigo, providers of guarantor loans, faced a significant number of claims, made through the Financial Ombudsman (FOS fee claims) or otherwise (redress claims), in relation to their mis-sale of loans based on the affordability for the customers. The court held that: (i) as in Re Port Finance Investment Limited [2021] EWHC 378 (Ch), there was no obvious ‘roadblock’ which would lead the court at the sanction hearing to consider that the release of Amigo companies and their directors by way of the deed of release fell outside the scope of Part

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll