header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 1 November 2024

01 November 2024
Issue: 8092 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Disclosure

Harrington & Charles Trading ­Company Ltd (In Liquidation) and others v Mehta and others [2024] EWHC 2674 (Ch)

The claimants obtained a worldwide freezing order against the family defendants in relation to an alleged fraud claim. The family defendants disclosed assets worth around $146m, including over $90m in receivables from an individual called Mr Ahli (the Ahli receivables). The first defendant, Jatin, entered into a third-party funding agreement to fund his Indian legal proceedings, with payments routed through an intermediary called Shouq Al Kathiri. The claimants were concerned about the lack of transparency around the Ahli receivables, the third-party funding agreement, and the use of Shouq Al Kathiri as an intermediary.

The court ordered limited disclosure in relation to the Indian legal proceedings, including: an affidavit from Jatin detailing how he funded the proceedings and any payments made, including through Shouq Al Kathiri; disclosure of the third-party funding agreement, subject to confidentiality restrictions; copies of Jatin’s client ledgers and office account ledgers from the Indian legal representatives; and information from Jatin

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll