header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 1 August 2025

01 August 2025
Issue: 8127 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Conflict of laws

JP Morgan International Finance Ltd v Werealize.ComLtd; Karonis and others v JP Morgan International Finance Ltd [2025] EWHC 1842 (Comm)

The Commercial Court ruled on applications for anti-suit injunctions (ASIs) brought by WeRealize.com Ltd (WRL) and the directors of Viva Wallet Holdings Software Development S.A. (the Directors) to restrain claims commenced by JP Morgan International Finance Ltd against the directors in Greece under Art 919 of the Greek Civil Code. The court held that the directors were entitled to ASI relief in respect of the Greek proceedings on the basis that those proceedings breached an obligation to be implied into cl 33 of the relevant shareholders’ agreement not to bring proceedings in a jurisdiction in which the cl 33 ‘no liability’ provision would not be effective. Accordingly, the Directors were granted ASI relief on this basis. The court rejected the alternate claims for ASI relief, such as quasi-contractual arguments or vexatious and oppressive conduct.


Criminal law

R v Hayes; R v Palombo [2025] UKSC 29

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll